The Mystic and the Maze

What Piranesi Taught Me About Reality

Note: This piece contains light spoilers for Piranesi by Susanna Clarke—mostly around character identities and thematic revelations.

It’s not a book review, but a personal reflection inspired by the story’s deeper psychological and spiritual currents. If you haven’t read the novel yet and want to go in completely blind, consider bookmarking this for after you finish. Otherwise, read on—I think the mystery will still hold.

I picked up Piranesi for our book club without knowing a thing about it. I hadn’t read reviews or summaries—hadn’t even flipped through its pages. Something about the title, the cover, the feeling of it pulled me in. And looking back, I can see why. It didn’t just land in my hands—it landed in a very specific moment in my life.

What unfolded wasn’t just a reading experience. It felt like a quiet, layered conversation with the universe—a mirror held up to the world around me, and maybe even more so, the world within.

Two Readings, One Reflection

There are so many ways to read Piranesi. On one level, it’s about psychological manipulation. The character known as “The Other” isolates and controls Piranesi (formerly Matthew Rose Sorensen), keeping the truth from him, reshaping his sense of reality, and using him for a hidden agenda. From this angle, the book becomes a metaphor for how easily people can be conditioned to live inside someone else’s narrative—cut off from memory, intuition, and even their own truth.

That hit close to home.

It echoed not only the larger cultural forces and collective dynamics that can quietly reshape our sense of reality—the kind that revise memory, erode trust, and keep us suspended in a low hum of uncertainty—but also the more intimate psychological patterns we sometimes find ourselves caught within.

The slow, invisible erosion of self-trust. The disorientation that arises when someone subtly rewrites your story—through gentle deflections, shifting blame, or denying your lived experience entirely.

It’s a psychological landscape I know well—not just from personal experience, but through the work I now do with others who are learning to name what once felt unspeakable… and find their way back to clarity, intuition, and inner authority.

And what moved me most about Piranesi was how quietly he finds his way out. He doesn’t fight his captor in the usual sense. He remembers who he is. He reclaims his inner compass. He walks—deliberately, humbly—back to wholeness.

But that’s only one way to see the story.

There’s another lens that felt just as powerful, and honestly, even more aligned with where I am now.

In this version, Piranesi isn’t a man broken by delusion—he’s someone who’s undergone a profound spiritual awakening.

He’s not trapped. He’s in communion.

Rather than living in a prison, he lives inside something sacred—a vast world of echoing halls, tidal rhythms, majestic statues. Silence. Presence. Stillness.

Piranesi doesn’t grasp or strive. He’s not seeking meaning; he’s living in it. His world isn’t impoverished—it’s overflowing. The statues he contemplates aren’t just beautiful—they’re archetypal. Almost Platonic. Reflections of something deeper than form.

Reading it this way felt uncanny. Familiar, even.

Because this past year, I’ve been moving through my own kind of awakening. A shedding of inherited beliefs and performative identities. A quiet return to something more true. Spacious. Honest. Less about what’s “real” and more about what feels aligned.

And suddenly, here was this character, alone in a vast, mysterious world… living in right relationship with it. Free of ego. Free of time.

Of course, I could chalk this up to projection—to seeing what I’m primed to see. Maybe I was just reading my inner state into the story. But still, the resonance—the timing, the texture—felt too deep to ignore.

Reading it felt like walking through a version of my own interior.

The cover of Piranesi features a satyr—evocative of Pan, the wild god of liminality, intuition, and nature’s forgotten wisdom. I was drawn to this book before I knew what it was about… or that it would echo a year-long encounter I’d had with this very archetype. Another quiet nudge from the unseen.

Madness or Mysticism?

I’ll be honest—this part was the hardest to write.

There’s a quiet fear that rises when I start putting words to how the world feels to me now. When I talk about living in a “meaning-saturated reality,” I know how that can sound. To some ears—especially clinical ones—it’s a symptom.

Because in psychological terms, the experience of seeing signs, symbols, or hidden meanings in everything—of pattern-seeking where none exist—is sometimes pathologized.

And so I’ve found myself asking the question I imagine many others have, too:

How do we tell the difference between madness and awakening?

Between the soul speaking… and the mind fragmenting?

Between delusion and revelation?

It’s a question that echoes through literature as well. Think of Joseph Conrad, James Joyce, Umberto Eco… even Oscar Wilde. Characters wandering symbolic worlds, unsure whether they’re being initiated, seduced, or slowly undone.

There’s a quote I’ve held close for years—one that felt especially alive while reading Piranesi:

“The psychotic drowns in the same waters in which the mystic swims with delight.” ~Joseph Campbell

And I kept wondering: was Piranesi swimming? Or drowning?

Was he broken by trauma… or liberated by insight?

Maybe it could’ve gone either way.

But what struck me was how he held his reality. He didn’t resist it. He listened. He moved through it with presence and reverence. And when fragments of his old life returned, he didn’t reject them or cling to them. He held both stories. Both selves.

To me, that’s what makes the difference—not the symbols themselves, but the way we meet them.

Not the mystery, but the relationship we have with it.

Not to escape the maze.

But to make peace with it.

The House as Consciousness

The House, for me, began to feel like a metaphor for consciousness itself.

It’s vast. Layered. Symbolic. Reflective. Its architecture defies logic. The tides come and go, rhythmic but unpredictable. It’s both still and alive. Empty and full.

And Piranesi’s relationship to the House—how he honors it, listens to it, lives within it—feels like a map for what it means to experience life through a nondual lens. No separation between self and world. No need to control or define everything. Just… communion. A kind of sacred participation.

In the House, there is no “outside.” There is no exile. There’s only what is. And everything is part of it. Everything is the self.

And that kind of reawakening—it’s not just about disentangling from difficult dynamics or finding distance from someone who once held too much influence. It speaks to something bigger.

It’s the moment we begin to wake up from the quiet web of conditioning we didn’t even know we were caught in. The roles we were handed. The stories we absorbed. The “truths” we performed without realizing they weren’t truly ours.

At first, it can feel like freedom. Like you’ve finally escaped the prison.

But eventually, you realize—the prison wasn’t made of walls.

It was made of thoughts.

Of old meanings. Expectations. Fears. Internalized voices. And once that structure dissolves, what’s left isn’t just freedom. It’s something quieter. More alive. A kind of sacred spaciousness.

A stillness inside.

And with it, a realization that changes everything:

You were never truly lost.

You were just misled about the nature of home.

Not a Puzzle, But a Presence

This is how life feels to me now, more and more. Not like a puzzle I’m trying to solve. But a presence I’m trying to meet.

A reality to move through with reverence.

Where synchronicities don’t feel like coincidences—but like tiny ripples from something intelligent. Not “out there,” but through and in us. Nudging. Echoing. Calling us into deeper alignment.

I’m not sharing any of this as a grand claim or proof of something absolute. I’m not trying to argue a point or convert anyone. This is just my lived experience right now—mysterious, layered, unfolding.

And Piranesi met me there.

I chose it without knowing why.

And it turned out to be a perfect mirror.

Maybe that’s just coincidence. Or maybe… just maybe… it’s another echo from the House — that is, from the Universe.

Walking the Labyrinth

The name Piranesi originally belonged to an Italian artist known for his haunting sketches of elaborate, impossible prisons—dark, dizzying labyrinths with endless staircases and architectural paradoxes. In the book, the name is given to Sorensen by Ketterley, his captor, as a way to strip him of identity.

But by the end, he reclaims Piranesi as his name..

Not as a symbol of imprisonment—but as something sacred.

A name for someone who has walked the corridors of the self. Who has stood in the mystery and learned how to live inside it. Not in fear. But with wonder.

And maybe that’s what the book is really whispering to us.

Not how to escape the maze.

But how to stay.

How to live with it. In it. As it.

With curiosity. With presence.

With the quiet knowledge that you’re not lost.

You’re already home.

---

Credits¹

1. Credit: voiceover music from #Uppbeat. License code: WQ74PMDZM5PN8UK2

Sound Effects by freesound_community from Pixabay